James, R (On The Application Of) v Joint Disciplinary Scheme [2001] EWHC Admin 1068 (20th December, 2001)
The sum in court was paid pending domestic appeals, which have been exhausted; the Defendant is entitled to payment of its costs and no good reason exists to delay payment pending European proceedings.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWHC Admin 1068
- Parties
- Claimant: Gerald Reaveley James; Defendant: Joint Disciplinary Scheme
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Post Refusal of Leave to Appeal; Application for Retention of Funds Pending European Proceedings
- Outcome
- Defendant's application granted; Claimant's application refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Costs, Appeals, Retention of Funds
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerald Reaveley James
Claimant
Joint Disciplinary Scheme
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Refusal of Leave to Appeal; Application for Retention of Funds Pending European Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sum paid into court should remain pending application to the European Court of Human Rights
- 2 Whether the Defendant is entitled to payment of its costs after exhaustion of domestic remedies
Ratio Decidendi
The sum in court was paid pending domestic appeals, which have been exhausted; the Defendant is entitled to payment of its costs and no good reason exists to delay payment pending European proceedings.
Court Disposition
Defendant's application granted; Claimant's application refused.
Orders
- The sum of £4,700 paid into court to be paid out immediately to the Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment