Jon Newman v R
The judge was entitled to structure sentences to reflect separate criminality for possession of indecent images and breaches of SOPOs, and to impose consecutive sentences for offences committed before and after July 2019. However, the overall sentence of 7 years 8 months was disproportionate; making count 1 of the committal for sentence concurrent and reducing count 2 to 30 months achieves proportionality, resulting in a total sentence of 6 years 9 months.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Jon Newman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Totality Principle, Sexual Offences, Breach of Sexual Offence Prevention Order, Possession of Indecent Images
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Jon Newman
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the overall sentence imposed was proportionate under the totality principle
- 2 Whether sentences for breaches of SOPO should have been concurrent rather than consecutive
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to structure sentences to reflect separate criminality for possession of indecent images and breaches of SOPOs, and to impose consecutive sentences for offences committed before and after July 2019. However, the overall sentence of 7 years 8 months was disproportionate; making count 1 of the committal for sentence concurrent and reducing count 2 to 30 months achieves proportionality, resulting in a total sentence of 6 years 9 months.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Overall sentence reduced from 7 years 8 months to 6 years 9 months
- Count 1 of committal for sentence made concurrent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment