Sangamneheri v Bellamy [2018] EWHC 2569 (Comm) (24 May 2018)

Sangamneheri v Bellamy [2018] EWHC 2569 (Comm) (24 May 2018)

All outstanding applications by the claimant are totally without merit, as the claim that the arbitrator or Chartered Institute became bailees is legally unsustainable, the fraud allegations are baseless, and the claim has already been struck out and subject to an extended civil restraint order.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 2569 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Sayed Sangamneheri; Defendant: Jonathan Bellamy; Proposed Defendant: President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Proposed Defendant: Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Proposed Defendant: Reynolds Porter Chamberlain; Proposed Defendant: Andrew Mayler
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Post Strike Out, Hearing of Outstanding Applications After Extended Civil Restraint Order
Outcome
All outstanding applications dismissed as totally without merit.
Legal Topics
Civil Restraint Orders, Strike Out Applications, Bailment, Torts (interference With Goods) Act 1977, Arbitrator's Duties, Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Civil Procedure Arbitration Civil Restraint Orders Strike Out Applications Bailment Torts (interference With Goods) Act 1977 Arbitrator's Duties Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayed Sangamneheri

Claimant

Jonathan Bellamy

Defendant

President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Proposed Defendant

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Proposed Defendant

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain

Proposed Defendant

Andrew Mayler

Proposed Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim / Post Strike Out, Hearing of Outstanding Applications After Extended Civil Restraint Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's outstanding applications have merit after the claim was struck out and an extended civil restraint order made
  2. 2 Whether an arbitrator or arbitral institution can be a bailee of goods in dispute
  3. 3 Whether the arbitrator or institution committed fraud or dishonesty in correspondence or declarations

Ratio Decidendi

All outstanding applications by the claimant are totally without merit, as the claim that the arbitrator or Chartered Institute became bailees is legally unsustainable, the fraud allegations are baseless, and the claim has already been struck out and subject to an extended civil restraint order.

Court Disposition

All outstanding applications dismissed as totally without merit.

Orders

  • All outstanding applications by the claimant are dismissed.
  • No further applications on these grounds may be made without permission under the extended civil restraint order.