Sangamneheri v Bellamy

Sangamneheri v Bellamy

The outstanding applications are totally without merit as the arbitrator and Chartered Institute did not become bailees of gold bullion, the claim under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 is hopeless, and allegations of fraud are baseless.

Parties
Claimant: Sayed Sangamneheri; Defendant: Jonathan Bellamy; Proposed Defendant: President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Proposed Defendant: Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Proposed Defendant: Reynolds Porter Chamberlain; Proposed Defendant: Andrew Mayler
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Strike Out, Hearing of Outstanding Applications
Outcome
applications dismissed as totally without merit
Legal Topics
Civil Restraint Orders, Strike Out Applications, Arbitrator Liability, Bailment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Civil Procedure Arbitration Tort Civil Restraint Orders Strike Out Applications Arbitrator Liability Bailment Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayed Sangamneheri

Claimant

Jonathan Bellamy

Defendant

President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Proposed Defendant

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Proposed Defendant

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain

Proposed Defendant

Andrew Mayler

Proposed Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Strike Out, Hearing of Outstanding Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitrator and Chartered Institute became bailees of gold bullion under the contract
  2. 2 Whether a claim under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 is viable
  3. 3 Whether the arbitrator or Chartered Institute made fraudulent or dishonest statements

Ratio Decidendi

The outstanding applications are totally without merit as the arbitrator and Chartered Institute did not become bailees of gold bullion, the claim under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 is hopeless, and allegations of fraud are baseless.

Court Disposition

applications dismissed as totally without merit

Orders

  • All outstanding applications are dismissed.
  • No further claims in bailment or under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 are permitted.