R v Jonathan Jackson

None of the proposed grounds of appeal have any substance and there is no doubt as to the safety of the conviction; therefore, the application for extension of time is refused.

Parties: Prosecution: R Ex; Applicant: Jonathan Jackson
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 16 January 2026
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction
Outcome: application refused
Legal Topics: Grievous Bodily Harm, Appeal Procedure, Forensic Evidence, Jury Bias, Legal Representation

Criminal Law Grievous Bodily Harm Appeal Procedure Forensic Evidence Jury Bias Legal Representation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

R Ex

Prosecution

Jonathan Jackson

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

1 whether grounds for appeal against conviction have substance
2 whether extension of time to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

None of the proposed grounds of appeal have any substance and there is no doubt as to the safety of the conviction; therefore, the application for extension of time is refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

renewed application for extension of time to appeal conviction is refused