Jackson, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1604 (21 November 2025)

Jackson, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1604 (21 November 2025)

None of the applicant's grounds of appeal had any substance; there was no doubt as to the safety of the conviction, and therefore no purpose would be served by granting an extension of time to appeal.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 1604
Parties
Prosecution: R; Applicant: Jonathan Jackson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent, Extension of Time, Unsafe Conviction, Forensic Evidence, Jury Bias, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Criminal Law Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent Extension of Time Unsafe Conviction Forensic Evidence Jury Bias Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Jonathan Jackson

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for grievous bodily harm with intent is unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal his conviction

Ratio Decidendi

None of the applicant's grounds of appeal had any substance; there was no doubt as to the safety of the conviction, and therefore no purpose would be served by granting an extension of time to appeal.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Renewed application for extension of time to appeal conviction is refused.