Colliver v Papworth & Anor [2021] EWHC 1450 (Ch) (28 May 2021)
Permission is granted to the Defendants to amend their Defence to plead a binding agreement on 12 February 2010 and to rely on the Deed of Agreement and Release, including withdrawal of admissions, as the amendments have more than merely fanciful prospects of success and the balance of discretionary factors and overriding objective favour allowing the amendments. The factual and legal issues raised require determination at trial and cannot be resolved at this stage.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1450 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Anthony Robert Colliver; Defendant: Jonathan Papworth; Defendant: Simon Charles Papworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Business/property / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to amend Defence allowed; permission granted to withdraw admissions.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Release Clauses, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duties, Withdrawal of Admissions, Rescission, Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Robert Colliver
Claimant
Jonathan Papworth
Defendant
Simon Charles Papworth
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Business/property / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Defendants should be permitted to amend their Defence to plead a binding agreement on 12 February 2010 and rely on a Deed of Agreement and Release
- 2 Whether Claimant should be permitted to amend particulars of claim to plead fraudulent misrepresentation and rescission
- 3 Whether withdrawal of admissions (express and implied) should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
Permission is granted to the Defendants to amend their Defence to plead a binding agreement on 12 February 2010 and to rely on the Deed of Agreement and Release, including withdrawal of admissions, as the amendments have more than merely fanciful prospects of success and the balance of discretionary factors and overriding objective favour allowing the amendments. The factual and legal issues raised require determination at trial and cannot be resolved at this stage.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to amend Defence allowed; permission granted to withdraw admissions.
Orders
- Defendants permitted to amend Defence as proposed.
- Claimant's application to amend particulars of claim to be considered at subsequent hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment