Porter & Anor, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1485 (14 December 2023)
The cash delivered to ETL was criminal property because it represented a benefit from the criminal conduct of alcohol duty evasion, and there was sufficient evidence for the jury to be satisfied of this. The particulars of the indictment, even if including Mr Porter as a beneficiary, did not invalidate the charge as the substance of the case was clear and the words were surplusage.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1485
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Jonathan Porter; Applicant: Peter Stanley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Money Laundering, Proceeds of Crime, Appeals, Predicate Offence, Indictment Particulars
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Jonathan Porter
Applicant
Peter Stanley
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence that the cash delivered to ETL was criminal property under s.328(1) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
- 2 Whether the particulars of the indictment disclosed an offence known to law under s.328(1) POCA
Ratio Decidendi
The cash delivered to ETL was criminal property because it represented a benefit from the criminal conduct of alcohol duty evasion, and there was sufficient evidence for the jury to be satisfied of this. The particulars of the indictment, even if including Mr Porter as a beneficiary, did not invalidate the charge as the substance of the case was clear and the words were surplusage.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- Renewed applications for leave to appeal against conviction are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment