Englefield & Anor v Steinberg [2005] EWHC 943 (Ch) (27th april 2005)
The defendant's illness does not provide sufficient grounds to delay enforcement of the charging order or sale of the property, especially given the lack of substantive evidence or appeal, the interests of other parties, and the declining market. A short adjournment is granted only to allow the defendant to make a supported application, failing which the stay will be lifted.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 943 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Pritchard Englefield; Claimant: Michael Leslie Cohn; Defendant: Jonathan Roger Steinberg
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Enforce Charging Order / Post Judgment Enforcement
- Outcome
- Order for enforcement of charging order and sale of property, with a 21-day stay on exchange of contracts to allow defendant to apply to set aside the order.
- Legal Topics
- Charging Order, Enforcement of Judgment, Sale of Property, Adjournment Due to Illness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pritchard Englefield
Claimant
Michael Leslie Cohn
Claimant
Jonathan Roger Steinberg
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Enforce Charging Order / Post Judgment Enforcement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the charging order over the reversionary interest should be enforced and the property sold
- 2 Whether the defendant's illness justifies an adjournment or prevents enforcement
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's illness does not provide sufficient grounds to delay enforcement of the charging order or sale of the property, especially given the lack of substantive evidence or appeal, the interests of other parties, and the declining market. A short adjournment is granted only to allow the defendant to make a supported application, failing which the stay will be lifted.
Court Disposition
Order for enforcement of charging order and sale of property, with a 21-day stay on exchange of contracts to allow defendant to apply to set aside the order.
Orders
- Stay on exchange of contract for sale for 21 days unless defendant issues and serves an application with evidence to set aside the order within that period.
- Liberty to claimants to apply for early determination if such application is made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment