Franks v Sinclair & Ors
Mr Franks failed to establish, on the balance of probabilities, that Mrs Franks knew and approved the contents of the 1994 will. The circumstances raised significant suspicion, and Mr Franks' evidence was not credible. There was no evidence of any change in Mrs Franks' intentions or relationships that would explain the change in beneficiaries. The 1992 will reflected her longstanding intentions and close relationship with Jonathan.
- Parties
- Claimant: Morley Lionel Bowman Franks; Defendant: Jonathan Sinclair; Defendant: David Sinclair; Defendant: Ann Sinclair
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; 1992 will pronounced valid
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Knowledge and Approval of Will, Undue Influence, Professional Conduct of Solicitors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morley Lionel Bowman Franks
Claimant
Jonathan Sinclair
Defendant
David Sinclair
Defendant
Ann Sinclair
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Jennie Franks knew and approved the contents of the 1994 will
- 2 Whether the 1994 will should be admitted to probate
- 3 Whether the 1992 will should be pronounced valid
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Franks failed to establish, on the balance of probabilities, that Mrs Franks knew and approved the contents of the 1994 will. The circumstances raised significant suspicion, and Mr Franks' evidence was not credible. There was no evidence of any change in Mrs Franks' intentions or relationships that would explain the change in beneficiaries. The 1992 will reflected her longstanding intentions and close relationship with Jonathan.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; 1992 will pronounced valid
Orders
- Relief sought by Mr Franks refused
- 1992 will of Mrs Jennie Franks pronounced for force and validity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment