Steinberg v Englefield & Anor

Steinberg v Englefield & Anor

The overlooked psychiatric report would not have led to an adjournment or different outcome, as it did not show the appellant would ever be able to conduct his case or secure representation. The underlying appeal had no real prospect of success, as the arguments advanced were unsupported by evidence and had already been considered. Justice required finality and the interests of the respondents prevailed.

Parties
Appellant: Jonathan Steinberg; Respondent: Pritchard Englefield & Another
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Judgment
Outcome
application to set aside judgment dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment, Summary Judgment, Right to Fair Trial, Abuse of Process
Civil Procedure Defamation Setting Aside Judgment Summary Judgment Right to Fair Trial Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Steinberg

Appellant

Pritchard Englefield & Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judgment dismissing the appeal should be set aside due to the appellant's absence and psychiatric condition
  2. 2 Whether the overlooked psychiatric report would have led to an adjournment or different outcome
  3. 3 Whether the underlying appeal had any prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The overlooked psychiatric report would not have led to an adjournment or different outcome, as it did not show the appellant would ever be able to conduct his case or secure representation. The underlying appeal had no real prospect of success, as the arguments advanced were unsupported by evidence and had already been considered. Justice required finality and the interests of the respondents prevailed.

Court Disposition

application to set aside judgment dismissed

Orders

  • Application to set aside judgment of 3 March 2005 dismissed
  • Application for stay of execution refused