Jones v Jones
Permission to appeal is granted on grounds 2, 3, and 4 because the attribution of 60% of the company value to pre-marital endeavour and the resulting asset division may constitute an error of principle not justified by evidence. Permission is refused on ground 1 as the difference in figures is marginal and not sufficient to warrant appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jones; Respondent: Jones
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Ancillary Relief (family) / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Asset Division, Discretion of Trial Judge, Appeal Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jones
Appellant
Jones
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Ancillary Relief (family) / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in attributing 60% of the value of the husband's company to pre-marital endeavour
- 2 Whether the award to the wife was too low given the length of the marriage and the assets created during the marriage
- 3 Whether the judge's assessment of the duration of the marriage relative to the business was correct
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on grounds 2, 3, and 4 because the attribution of 60% of the company value to pre-marital endeavour and the resulting asset division may constitute an error of principle not justified by evidence. Permission is refused on ground 1 as the difference in figures is marginal and not sufficient to warrant appeal.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused on ground 1
- Permission to appeal granted on grounds 2, 3, and 4
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment