Jones v Wrexham Borough Council

Jones v Wrexham Borough Council

The CFA, when construed together with the Rule 15 letter and insurance policy, was a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A, as the client had no liability for own-side costs except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5). Therefore, Regulation 4 was disapplied and the CFA was enforceable.

Parties
Appellant: Jones; Respondent: Wrexham Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Manchester County Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Conditional Fee Agreements, Enforceability of Cfas, Interpretation of Regulations, Solicitor Client Relationship

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jones

Appellant

Wrexham Borough Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Manchester County Court

  1. 1 Whether the CFA in question was a 'CFA Lite' within the meaning of Regulation 3A of the 2003 Regulations
  2. 2 Whether Regulation 4(2)(e)(ii) of the 2000 Regulations applied and was complied with
  3. 3 Whether the Rule 15 letter forms part of the CFA contract and affects enforceability

Ratio Decidendi

The CFA, when construed together with the Rule 15 letter and insurance policy, was a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A, as the client had no liability for own-side costs except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5). Therefore, Regulation 4 was disapplied and the CFA was enforceable.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The CFA is enforceable as a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A of the 2003 Regulations.
  • No liability for own-side costs on the client except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5).