Jones v Wrexham Borough Council
The CFA, when construed together with the Rule 15 letter and insurance policy, was a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A, as the client had no liability for own-side costs except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5). Therefore, Regulation 4 was disapplied and the CFA was enforceable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jones; Respondent: Wrexham Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Manchester County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Enforceability of Cfas, Interpretation of Regulations, Solicitor Client Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jones
Appellant
Wrexham Borough Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Manchester County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CFA in question was a 'CFA Lite' within the meaning of Regulation 3A of the 2003 Regulations
- 2 Whether Regulation 4(2)(e)(ii) of the 2000 Regulations applied and was complied with
- 3 Whether the Rule 15 letter forms part of the CFA contract and affects enforceability
Ratio Decidendi
The CFA, when construed together with the Rule 15 letter and insurance policy, was a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A, as the client had no liability for own-side costs except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5). Therefore, Regulation 4 was disapplied and the CFA was enforceable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The CFA is enforceable as a 'CFA Lite' under Regulation 3A of the 2003 Regulations.
- No liability for own-side costs on the client except as permitted by Regulation 3A(5).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment