R v Jordan Joseph Gabriel

R v Jordan Joseph Gabriel

The sentence was not manifestly excessive; the applicant occupied a leading role in a category 1 conspiracy to supply class A drugs; credit for guilty plea was appropriately assessed; fresh evidence was not admissible and would not have affected the outcome.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Jordan Joseph Gabriel
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Conspiracy to Supply Drugs, Conspiracy to Possess Prohibited Weapon, Credit for Guilty Plea, Categorisation of Offence
Criminal Law Sentencing Conspiracy to Supply Drugs Conspiracy to Possess Prohibited Weapon Credit for Guilty Plea Categorisation of Offence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Jordan Joseph Gabriel

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for guilty pleas
  3. 3 Whether the categorisation of the drug offence was correct

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was not manifestly excessive; the applicant occupied a leading role in a category 1 conspiracy to supply class A drugs; credit for guilty plea was appropriately assessed; fresh evidence was not admissible and would not have affected the outcome.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused

Orders

  • application refused