R v Jordan Murray
The sentence was just and proportionate, with sufficient discount for totality, and there was no arguable merit in the appeal.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Jordan Murray
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Sentencing, Prison Offences, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Jordan Murray
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against sentence
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was just and proportionate, considering totality
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was just and proportionate, with sufficient discount for totality, and there was no arguable merit in the appeal.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment