XX & Anor v Jordan Young & Anor

XX & Anor v Jordan Young & Anor

The assessed costs were disproportionate in all the circumstances; further reduction to internal communications was warranted, resulting in a proportionate figure.

Parties
Claimant: XX (a protected party by her husband and litigation friend YY); Second Claimant: ZZ; Defendant: Jordan Young; Defendant: Aviva Insurance Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Post Settlement Detailed Assessment
Outcome
Further reduction applied to internal communications; assessed bill total reduced to £324,029.77, representing reasonable and proportionate costs.
Legal Topics
Proportionality, Detailed Assessment, Conduct, Vulnerability, Internal Communications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 15
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XX (a protected party by her husband and litigation friend YY)

Claimant

ZZ

Second Claimant

Jordan Young

Defendant

Aviva Insurance Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment / Post Settlement Detailed Assessment

  1. 1 Whether the assessed costs are proportionate under CPR 44.3(5)
  2. 2 Appropriate reductions for internal communications
  3. 3 Impact of conduct and vulnerability on costs

Ratio Decidendi

The assessed costs were disproportionate in all the circumstances; further reduction to internal communications was warranted, resulting in a proportionate figure.

Court Disposition

Further reduction applied to internal communications; assessed bill total reduced to £324,029.77, representing reasonable and proportionate costs.

Orders

  • Internal communications costs reduced to £10,000 plus VAT.
  • Base profit costs (excluding costs of drawing and checking the bill) reduced to £169,534.99 (excluding VAT).