R v Joseph Ronan

R v Joseph Ronan

The applicant's guilty pleas were unequivocal and supported by strong evidence. There was no procedural irregularity, misrepresentation, or disclosure failure that undermined the safety of the convictions. The alleged fresh evidence was neither fresh nor reliable. No arguable ground of appeal was disclosed, and the application was wholly without merit.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Joseph Ronan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application refused as wholly without merit
Legal Topics
Harassment, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Guilty Plea, Appeal Against Conviction, Fresh Evidence, Loss of Time Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Joseph Ronan

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether there were arguable grounds to appeal against conviction following guilty pleas
  2. 2 Whether there was procedural irregularity or misrepresentation by defence counsel
  3. 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted under section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's guilty pleas were unequivocal and supported by strong evidence. There was no procedural irregularity, misrepresentation, or disclosure failure that undermined the safety of the convictions. The alleged fresh evidence was neither fresh nor reliable. No arguable ground of appeal was disclosed, and the application was wholly without merit.

Court Disposition

application refused as wholly without merit

Orders

  • Extension of time to appeal against conviction refused
  • Permission to appeal against conviction refused