R v Joseph Ronan
The applicant's guilty pleas were unequivocal and supported by strong evidence. There was no procedural irregularity, misrepresentation, or disclosure failure that undermined the safety of the convictions. The alleged fresh evidence was neither fresh nor reliable. No arguable ground of appeal was disclosed, and the application was wholly without merit.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Joseph Ronan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application refused as wholly without merit
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Guilty Plea, Appeal Against Conviction, Fresh Evidence, Loss of Time Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Joseph Ronan
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there were arguable grounds to appeal against conviction following guilty pleas
- 2 Whether there was procedural irregularity or misrepresentation by defence counsel
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted under section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's guilty pleas were unequivocal and supported by strong evidence. There was no procedural irregularity, misrepresentation, or disclosure failure that undermined the safety of the convictions. The alleged fresh evidence was neither fresh nor reliable. No arguable ground of appeal was disclosed, and the application was wholly without merit.
Court Disposition
application refused as wholly without merit
Orders
- Extension of time to appeal against conviction refused
- Permission to appeal against conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment