R v Joshua Enodolomwanyi
The custodial element of five and a half years was manifestly excessive given the unusual facts and lack of clear evidence of intent to cause serious sexual harm; a custodial term of four years is appropriate. The Recorder was entitled to find the appellant dangerous and impose an extended sentence based on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Joshua Enodolomwanyi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Kidnapping, Sentencing, Dangerous Offenders, Mental Health and Sentencing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Joshua Enodolomwanyi
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial element of the sentence was manifestly excessive for attempted kidnapping
- 2 Whether the Recorder was entitled to find the appellant dangerous and impose an extended sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The custodial element of five and a half years was manifestly excessive given the unusual facts and lack of clear evidence of intent to cause serious sexual harm; a custodial term of four years is appropriate. The Recorder was entitled to find the appellant dangerous and impose an extended sentence based on the reports and circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Quash the extended determinate sentence of nine years and six months.
- Substitute an extended determinate sentence of eight years, comprising a custodial element of four years and an extended licence period of four years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment