R v Joshua Robert Long
Greater weight should have been given to the appellant's period of good conduct and rehabilitation prior to sentencing, warranting a reduction in the operational period of the suspended sentence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Joshua Robert Long; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Suspended Sentence, Service Detention, Military Discipline
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Joshua Robert Long
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the operational period of the suspended sentence was excessive given the appellant's conduct prior to sentencing
- 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to the appellant's period of good behaviour before sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Greater weight should have been given to the appellant's period of good conduct and rehabilitation prior to sentencing, warranting a reduction in the operational period of the suspended sentence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of 7 days' service detention suspended for 12 months quashed
- Substituted sentence of 7 days' service detention suspended for 8 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment