Heathrow Airport Ltd & Ors v Garman & Ors [2007] EWHC 1957 (QB) (06 August 2007)
Representative orders against HACAN, AirportWatch, and NoTRAG were discharged due to divergence of interests and lack of evidence of organisational support for unlawful direct action. No sufficient evidential basis existed for apprehended harassment by most Defendants or their organisations. Only Plane Stupid, represented by Garman and Murray, was found to have a unified purpose of direct action, including unlawful action, justifying continuation of the representative order and consideration of injunctive relief against them. The threshold for injunctive relief under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 was not met for most Defendants, as anticipated protest did not amount to...
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 1957 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Heathrow Airport Limited; Claimant: Mark William Bullock; Defendant: Joss Garman; Defendant: Leo Murray; Defendant: Joss Garman and Leo Murray (for Plane Stupid); Defendant: John Stewart (for HACAN and AirportWatch); Defendant: Geraldine Nicholson (for No Third Runway Action Group); Intervener: Transport for London; Intervener: London Underground Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunctive Relief / Interim Injunction Hearing
- Outcome
- Representative orders against HACAN, AirportWatch, and NoTRAG discharged; claims against Fourth and Fifth Defendants struck out; representative order against Plane Stupid continued; injunctive relief to be considered only against Plane Stupid and its representatives; undertakings accepted from certain Defendants; no...
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Representative Actions, Harassment, Freedom of Expression, Direct Action Protests, Unincorporated Associations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heathrow Airport Limited
Claimant
Mark William Bullock
Claimant
Joss Garman
Defendant
Leo Murray
Defendant
Joss Garman and Leo Murray (for Plane Stupid)
Defendant
John Stewart (for HACAN and AirportWatch)
Defendant
Geraldine Nicholson (for No Third Runway Action Group)
Defendant
Transport for London
Intervener
London Underground Limited
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunctive Relief / Interim Injunction Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim injunctive relief should be granted against environmental protestors under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and at common law for anticipated unlawful direct action at Heathrow Airport
- 2 Whether representative orders against unincorporated associations and their members are appropriate in this context
- 3 Whether the evidence supports a real apprehension of harassment or unlawful conduct justifying injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
Representative orders against HACAN, AirportWatch, and NoTRAG were discharged due to divergence of interests and lack of evidence of organisational support for unlawful direct action. No sufficient evidential basis existed for apprehended harassment by most Defendants or their organisations. Only Plane Stupid, represented by Garman and Murray, was found to have a unified purpose of direct action, including unlawful action, justifying continuation of the representative order and consideration of injunctive relief against them. The threshold for injunctive relief under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 was not met for most Defendants, as anticipated protest did not amount to...
Court Disposition
Representative orders against HACAN, AirportWatch, and NoTRAG discharged; claims against Fourth and Fifth Defendants struck out; representative order against Plane Stupid continued; injunctive relief to be considered only against Plane Stupid and its representatives; undertakings accepted from certain Defendants; no...
Orders
- Representative orders against HACAN, AirportWatch, and NoTRAG discharged
- Claims against Fourth and Fifth Defendants struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment