Gibbs v Harding & Ors
The clause in the will took effect as a gift to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster on charitable trusts, with the reference to 'black community' construed in accordance with section 34 of the Race Relations Act 1976, and the precise trusts to be settled by a scheme.
- Parties
- Claimant: John William Barratt Gibbs; Defendant: Joy Winsome Harding; Defendant: James Alexander Harding; Defendant: Lloyd George Wariah Harding; Defendant: Orell Harding-Mielke; Defendant: HM Attorney-General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/charity / Judgment
- Outcome
- Gift upheld as a valid charitable trust
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Gifts, Charitable Trusts, Intestacy, Precatory Words, Discriminatory Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John William Barratt Gibbs
Claimant
Joy Winsome Harding
Defendant
James Alexander Harding
Defendant
Lloyd George Wariah Harding
Defendant
Orell Harding-Mielke
Defendant
HM Attorney-General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/charity / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will created a valid testamentary gift and on what terms
- 2 Whether the gift was absolute, on charitable trusts, for the benefit of the CCC, or failed and intestacy resulted
- 3 Whether a gift to a class defined by colour is valid or void for uncertainty or public policy
Ratio Decidendi
The clause in the will took effect as a gift to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster on charitable trusts, with the reference to 'black community' construed in accordance with section 34 of the Race Relations Act 1976, and the precise trusts to be settled by a scheme.
Court Disposition
Gift upheld as a valid charitable trust
Orders
- The clause in the will takes effect as a gift to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster on charitable trusts.
- The precise nature of the trusts to be settled by a scheme.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment