Kowalski, R (On the Application Of) v Judicial Authority Poland
The appeal was dismissed because the grounds advanced by the appellant did not establish that extradition would be unjust, oppressive, or in breach of Article 8 ECHR. There was no evidence that the appellant's medical condition could not be treated in Poland, and the interruption of family life was a necessary consequence of extradition, not a breach of rights.
- Parties
- Claimant: Kowalski; Defendant: Judicial Authority Poland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Article 8 ECHR, Extradition Act 2003, Family Life, Medical Treatment in Prison
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kowalski
Claimant
Judicial Authority Poland
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition would be unjust, oppressive or prejudicial due to passage of time or personal circumstances
- 2 Whether extradition would breach the appellant's human rights under Article 8 ECHR
- 3 Whether the appellant's medical condition could be properly treated in Poland
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the grounds advanced by the appellant did not establish that extradition would be unjust, oppressive, or in breach of Article 8 ECHR. There was no evidence that the appellant's medical condition could not be treated in Poland, and the interruption of family life was a necessary consequence of extradition, not a breach of rights.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment