Cripps v Trustee Solutions Ltd
Section 73(3)(b) of the Pensions Act 1995 should be construed as limited to pension and other benefits in payment or payment of which a member has a right to demand, but not extending to benefits accrued outside the Barber window when the member has not yet reached the NRD under the Rules. Modifications to the scheme rules and priorities should only go as far as necessary to comply with European law.
- Parties
- Appellant: Julia Cripps; 1st Respondent: Trustee Solutions Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Stephen Patrick Comar; 3rd Respondent: Keith James Edwards; 4th Respondent: Leslie Dubery
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Order of Priority in Winding Up Occupational Pension Schemes, Interpretation of S 73 Pensions Act 1995, Effect of Barber and Coloroll ECJ Decisions, Normal Retirement Date (nrd), Application of European Equal Pay Law to Pensions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julia Cripps
Appellant
Trustee Solutions Ltd
1st Respondent
Stephen Patrick Comar
2nd Respondent
Keith James Edwards
3rd Respondent
Leslie Dubery
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How s 73(3)(b) of the Pensions Act 1995 applies to members with accrued Barber window benefits who have reached age 60 at winding up
- 2 Whether entitlement to payment under s 73(3)(b) includes only pensions in payment, or also those where the member can demand payment
- 3 Whether the statutory priorities should extend to all benefits or only those accrued in the Barber window
Ratio Decidendi
Section 73(3)(b) of the Pensions Act 1995 should be construed as limited to pension and other benefits in payment or payment of which a member has a right to demand, but not extending to benefits accrued outside the Barber window when the member has not yet reached the NRD under the Rules. Modifications to the scheme rules and priorities should only go as far as necessary to comply with European law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Declaration substituted: Members who had the right to retire at age 60 in respect of any part of their service and who were aged between 60 and 64 at the date the Scheme commenced winding up fell within s73(3)(b) but not in respect of pension or other benefits accrued by service to which an NRD at age 65 applied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment