Nicholas Martin & Anor. v Julia Kogan
The current IMDb credit, reflecting 'Written by' for both Martin and Kogan (with 'originally uncredited' for Kogan), best aligns with the judgment, the guidelines, and the facts, and should not be changed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicholas Martin; Claimant: Big Hat Stories Limited; Defendant: Julia Kogan; Part 20 Defendant: Florence Film Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Pathé Productions Limited; Part 20 Defendant: Qwerty Films Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Consequentials Hearing
- Outcome
- credit dispute resolved; no change to current IMDb credit
- Legal Topics
- Authorship, Film Credits, Screenplay Contribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Martin
Claimant
Big Hat Stories Limited
Claimant
Julia Kogan
Defendant
Florence Film Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Pathé Productions Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Qwerty Films Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Consequentials Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate IMDb credit for screenplay authorship
- 2 application of Writers Guild guidelines to credit allocation
Ratio Decidendi
The current IMDb credit, reflecting 'Written by' for both Martin and Kogan (with 'originally uncredited' for Kogan), best aligns with the judgment, the guidelines, and the facts, and should not be changed.
Court Disposition
credit dispute resolved; no change to current IMDb credit
Orders
- The current IMDb credit for the film complies with the Film Companies’ obligations under the judgment and ought not to be changed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment