Barker, R v
The reduction of six months for exceptional progress and assistance to authorities was appropriate and consistent with established practice and legitimate expectations. There was no evidence that the appellant's assistance placed her in real danger or warranted a greater reduction. Judicial discretion should not result in reductions that are unjust to other prisoners.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: R; Appellant: Julie Barker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Minimum Term Order Under Schedule 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Term for Life Sentence, Exceptional Progress in Prison, Assistance to Authorities, Judicial Discretion in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecutor
Julie Barker
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Minimum Term Order Under Schedule 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reduction in minimum term for exceptional progress and assistance to authorities was adequate
- 2 Whether judicial discretion in reducing tariffs should be constrained by previous Secretary of State practice
Ratio Decidendi
The reduction of six months for exceptional progress and assistance to authorities was appropriate and consistent with established practice and legitimate expectations. There was no evidence that the appellant's assistance placed her in real danger or warranted a greater reduction. Judicial discretion should not result in reductions that are unjust to other prisoners.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment