McMullon v Secure the Bridge Ltd (Rev 1)
The relationship arising out of the Credit Agreement was not unfair to the Appellant as she was not misled or unduly influenced, and was determined to obtain the loan; however, the default interest provision at 4% per month was void under sections 93 and/or 173 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and only the contractual rate of 1.5% per month pre-judgment was enforceable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Julie McMullon; Respondent: Secure The Bridge Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on unfairness; appeal allowed on interest provision.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Relationship, Interest Provisions, Regulated Credit Agreements, Conflict of Interest, Enforcement of Credit Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie McMullon
Appellant
Secure The Bridge Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the relationship arising out of the Credit Agreement was unfair under section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
- 2 Whether the default interest provision in the Credit Agreement was void under sections 93 and/or 173 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
Ratio Decidendi
The relationship arising out of the Credit Agreement was not unfair to the Appellant as she was not misled or unduly influenced, and was determined to obtain the loan; however, the default interest provision at 4% per month was void under sections 93 and/or 173 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and only the contractual rate of 1.5% per month pre-judgment was enforceable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on unfairness; appeal allowed on interest provision.
Orders
- Default interest provision at 4% per month declared void under sections 93 and/or 173 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
- Interest awarded at 1.5% per month pre-judgment only.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment