Pleming v Hampton & Anor

Pleming v Hampton & Anor

The respondents acquired title to the disputed land by adverse possession as they demonstrated factual possession and intention to possess; the counterclaim for transfer of the 2-foot strip failed as the promise was not made by the owner or with her authority, and there was no unconscionability or proprietary estoppel.

Parties
Appellant: Juliet Ella Pleming; Respondent: Peter Roderick Nigel Hampton; Respondent: Alison Muriel Jean Hampton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Proprietary Estoppel, Constructive Trust, Boundary Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Juliet Ella Pleming

Appellant

Peter Roderick Nigel Hampton

Respondent

Alison Muriel Jean Hampton

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondents acquired title to disputed land by adverse possession
  2. 2 Whether the respondents were entitled to a transfer of a 2-foot strip of land based on proprietary estoppel or constructive trust

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents acquired title to the disputed land by adverse possession as they demonstrated factual possession and intention to possess; the counterclaim for transfer of the 2-foot strip failed as the promise was not made by the owner or with her authority, and there was no unconscionability or proprietary estoppel.

Court Disposition

appeal and cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Respondents to be registered as proprietors of the disputed land as per the annexed plan
  • No order as to costs