Mampuya, R v
The sentences imposed, particularly the eighteen years' imprisonment on count 1, were not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offences, the use of knives, repeated assaults, and aggravating circumstances. The judge was entitled to treat count 1 as the lead offence and weight sentencing accordingly. Although counts 2 and 3 may have been category 2 offences, the concurrent sentences did not render the overall sentence excessive.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Junior Mampuya; Appellant: Apio Gomes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Joint Enterprise, Use of Knives, Grievous Bodily Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Junior Mampuya
Appellant
Apio Gomes
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed for wounding with intent were manifestly excessive
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability for counts 2 and 3 under Sentencing Council guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed, particularly the eighteen years' imprisonment on count 1, were not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offences, the use of knives, repeated assaults, and aggravating circumstances. The judge was entitled to treat count 1 as the lead offence and weight sentencing accordingly. Although counts 2 and 3 may have been category 2 offences, the concurrent sentences did not render the overall sentence excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeals against sentence dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment