Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated v Brownlie

Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated v Brownlie

The court has no jurisdiction over Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated because it was not party to the relevant contract, did not own or operate the Cairo hotel, and is not vicariously liable for the driver. The claims do not satisfy the factual requirements of the jurisdictional gateways under CPR 6BPD, para 3.1(6)(a) or 3.1(9)(a), nor is there a reasonable prospect of success against Holdings.

Parties
Appellant/respondent: Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated; Respondent/appellant: Brownlie (Lady Brownlie)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; court has no jurisdiction over Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated for the claims made.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Personal Injury, Choice of Law, Forum Conveniens, Vicarious Liability
Private International Law Tort Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Service Out of Jurisdiction Personal Injury Choice of Law +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated

Appellant/respondent

Brownlie (Lady Brownlie)

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction over Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated for claims arising from a fatal accident in Egypt
  2. 2 Whether the claims fall within the jurisdictional gateways under CPR 6BPD, para 3.1(6)(a) (contract) and 3.1(9)(a) (tort)
  3. 3 Whether there is a reasonable prospect of success against Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated

Ratio Decidendi

The court has no jurisdiction over Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated because it was not party to the relevant contract, did not own or operate the Cairo hotel, and is not vicariously liable for the driver. The claims do not satisfy the factual requirements of the jurisdictional gateways under CPR 6BPD, para 3.1(6)(a) or 3.1(9)(a), nor is there a reasonable prospect of success against Holdings.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; court has no jurisdiction over Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated for the claims made.

Orders

  • Declaration that the court has no jurisdiction to try any of the claims against Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated.
  • No order made on the cross-appeal; all other consequential matters remitted to the High Court for further applications by Lady Brownlie.