Fibula Air Travel SRL v Just-Us Air SRL
Fibula was the overall successful party as their amendments were not shut out, but a discount on costs was warranted due to their partial success and their own conduct. The hourly rate and hours claimed were reduced to guideline levels. Permission to appeal was refused as the issues raised were not fundamental to the prior judgment and did not give rise to issue estoppel.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fibula Air Travel SRL; Defendant: Just-Us Air SRL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Costs Ruling and Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded 65% of assessed costs; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Issue Estoppel, Amendment of Pleadings, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fibula Air Travel SRL
Claimant
Just-Us Air SRL
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Costs Ruling and Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is the successful party for costs purposes?
- 2 What proportion of costs should be awarded?
- 3 Whether the hourly rate and hours claimed are reasonable?
Ratio Decidendi
Fibula was the overall successful party as their amendments were not shut out, but a discount on costs was warranted due to their partial success and their own conduct. The hourly rate and hours claimed were reduced to guideline levels. Permission to appeal was refused as the issues raised were not fundamental to the prior judgment and did not give rise to issue estoppel.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded 65% of assessed costs; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Claimant to recover £37,375 as 65% of assessed costs.
- Permission to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment