OncoQR ML GmbH v Jacobs & Ors [2025] EWHC 1567 (Ch) (17 June 2025)
The company is functionally deadlocked and the relationship between directors has irretrievably broken down, rendering future management impossible. TYG is a quasi-partnership and neither side is solely responsible for the breakdown. Alleged breaches of fiduciary duty do not bar the petitioner from relief. No...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 1567 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: OncoQR ML GmbH; First Respondent: Frederick Jacobs; Second Respondent: Paul Broome; Third Respondent: TYG Oncology Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Just and Equitable Winding Up, Director Fiduciary Duties, Corporate Deadlock, Quasi Partnership, Clean Hands Doctrine
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OncoQR ML GmbH
Petitioner
Frederick Jacobs
First Respondent
Paul Broome
Second Respondent
TYG Oncology Limited
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is TYG Oncology Limited functionally deadlocked?
- 2 Has there been an irretrievable breakdown in the relationship between directors?
- 3 Should the company be wound up on just and equitable grounds?
Ratio Decidendi
The company is functionally deadlocked and the relationship between directors has irretrievably broken down, rendering future management impossible. TYG is a quasi-partnership and neither side is solely responsible for the breakdown. Alleged breaches of fiduciary duty do not bar the petitioner from relief. No realistic alternative remedy exists. It is just and equitable to wind up the company.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- TYG Oncology Limited to be wound up on just and equitable grounds.
- Liquidator to be appointed to investigate disputed transactions and potential misappropriation of funds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment