Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 37 (03 February 2012)

Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 37 (03 February 2012)

The employment tribunal decided that the respondents had made reasonable adjustments to the examination conditions, including extra time, breaks, split exams, and accommodation, which addressed the disadvantage caused by Mr Burke's disability. The appeal was dismissed as the adjustments were found reasonable and adequate.

Citation
[2012] EWCA Civ 37
Parties
Appellant: Justin Burke; First Respondent: The College of Law; Second Respondent: The Solicitors Regulation Authority
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Reasonable Adjustments, Competence Standards, Examination Conditions, Equality Act 2010, Disability Discrimination Act 1995
Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Competence Standards Examination Conditions Equality Act 2010 Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justin Burke

Appellant

The College of Law

First Respondent

The Solicitors Regulation Authority

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the time requirement for LPC examinations is a competence standard under s.14A(5) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether the respondents made reasonable adjustments to examination conditions for a disabled candidate

Ratio Decidendi

The employment tribunal decided that the respondents had made reasonable adjustments to the examination conditions, including extra time, breaks, split exams, and accommodation, which addressed the disadvantage caused by Mr Burke's disability. The appeal was dismissed as the adjustments were found reasonable and adequate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No further orders; respondents' adjustments deemed reasonable and adequate.