K v L [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam) (13 May 2010)
Given the wife's inherited wealth, the long but modest marriage, and the absence of joint contribution to asset growth, fairness is achieved by meeting the husband's needs fully and generously, not by equal sharing. The husband's reasonable requirements are more than met by a lump sum of £5 million, which is not to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: K; Respondent: L
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; lump sum order for the husband.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Inherited Assets, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 S.25, Needs Vs. Sharing Principle, Treatment of Inherited Wealth, CGT in Financial Remedy Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K
Applicant
L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Remedy) Following Divorce / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate treatment of inherited wealth in ancillary relief
- 2 Extent of sharing principle where assets are inherited and pre-marital
- 3 Assessment of needs versus sharing in long marriage
Ratio Decidendi
Given the wife's inherited wealth, the long but modest marriage, and the absence of joint contribution to asset growth, fairness is achieved by meeting the husband's needs fully and generously, not by equal sharing. The husband's reasonable requirements are more than met by a lump sum of £5 million, which is not to be increased by reference to the sharing principle.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; lump sum order for the husband.
Orders
- Wife to pay husband a lump sum of £5 million (or as per agreed formula) offshore, post-decree absolute.
- Wife to pay husband's reasonable legal costs of the ancillary relief application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment