K & Ors, R v

K & Ors, R v

The judge was entitled to manage the case by requiring written submissions and limiting oral argument, and all disclosure obligations had been met with no undisclosed prosecution material remaining.

Parties
Respondent: R; Appellant: K; Appellant: G; Appellant: H; Appellant: A; Appellant: M
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Case Management, Disclosure, Criminal Procedure Rules, Public Interest Immunity
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Case Management Disclosure Criminal Procedure Rules Public Interest Immunity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Respondent

K

Appellant

G

Appellant

H

Appellant

A

Appellant

M

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge's case management decisions regarding written submissions and oral argument were proper
  2. 2 Whether disclosure obligations under the Criminal Procedure Investigations Act 1996 and related protocols were met

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to manage the case by requiring written submissions and limiting oral argument, and all disclosure obligations had been met with no undisclosed prosecution material remaining.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed