Bhushan & Ors v Chand
From 1976 onwards, the brothers operated under a common intention to acquire and run assets for their joint benefit, evidenced by joint discussions, shared income, and collective management. The arrangement gives rise to a constructive trust, with all assets acquired under this arrangement held beneficially for all five brothers, regardless of legal title.
- Parties
- Claimant: Kul Bhushan; Claimant: Vinod Kumar; Claimant: Gurmel Chand; Claimant: Sat Paul; Defendant: Kahan Chand
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimants
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Beneficial Ownership, Common Intention, Family Business Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kul Bhushan
Claimant
Vinod Kumar
Claimant
Gurmel Chand
Claimant
Sat Paul
Claimant
Kahan Chand
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether properties and businesses acquired by the brothers are held on trust for their joint benefit
- 2 Whether a common intention constructive trust or proprietary estoppel arises from the arrangement between the brothers
- 3 Whether the defendant is sole beneficial owner of assets registered in his name
Ratio Decidendi
From 1976 onwards, the brothers operated under a common intention to acquire and run assets for their joint benefit, evidenced by joint discussions, shared income, and collective management. The arrangement gives rise to a constructive trust, with all assets acquired under this arrangement held beneficially for all five brothers, regardless of legal title.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimants
Orders
- Declaration that properties and businesses acquired from 1976 onwards are held on trust for all five brothers in equal shares
- Orders for accounts to be taken regarding Mastersons Fashions and Smethwick Working Men's Club
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment