R v Kamaran Kadar & Anor

R v Kamaran Kadar & Anor

The sentences imposed on both appellants were not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge properly assessed their roles, considered personal mitigation, and applied the relevant legal principles. The appeals were dismissed.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Kamaran Kadar; Appellant: Mariwan Mustafa
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
People Smuggling, Conspiracy to Facilitate Breach of Immigration Law, Assisting Unlawful Immigration, Sentencing
Criminal Law Immigration Law People Smuggling Conspiracy to Facilitate Breach of Immigration Law Assisting Unlawful Immigration Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Kamaran Kadar

Appellant

Mariwan Mustafa

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed on Kamaran Kadar and Mariwan Mustafa were manifestly excessive given their roles in a people smuggling operation
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge properly applied the relevant principles and considered personal mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed on both appellants were not manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge properly assessed their roles, considered personal mitigation, and applied the relevant legal principles. The appeals were dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • The appeals by Kamaran Kadar and Mariwan Mustafa against sentence are dismissed.