Kariama Ofori-Anim v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal struck out the application because it was commenced using the wrong form, referenced the wrong decision, and did not relate to a valid section 165 complaint; therefore, there was no reasonable prospect of success and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kariama Ofori-Anim; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Strike Out Application; Decision Without Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Data Subject Access Request, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Section 165 and 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Strike Out Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kariama Ofori-Anim
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Strike Out Application; Decision Without Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018
- 2 Whether the application has a reasonable prospect of success
- 3 Whether the correct procedural form and process were followed
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal struck out the application because it was commenced using the wrong form, referenced the wrong decision, and did not relate to a valid section 165 complaint; therefore, there was no reasonable prospect of success and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- The appeal is struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 as there is no reasonable prospect of success.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment