Katherine Bishop v The Information Commissioner

Katherine Bishop v The Information Commissioner

The Commissioner breached section 166(1)(b) DPA by failing to provide information about progress or outcome of the complaint within three months, but subsequently took appropriate steps and informed the Applicant of the outcome on 26 November 2025; therefore, no further action is required.

Parties
Applicant: Katherine Bishop; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018 / Final Determination Without Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed; no action taken as final outcome provided.
Legal Topics
Subject Access Request, Procedural Remedy, Commissioner’s Duties, Jurisdiction, Section 166 DPA

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Katherine Bishop

Applicant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018 / Final Determination Without Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Commissioner failed to take appropriate steps to respond to the complaint within the statutory timeframe
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to order the Commissioner to progress the complaint under section 166 DPA

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner breached section 166(1)(b) DPA by failing to provide information about progress or outcome of the complaint within three months, but subsequently took appropriate steps and informed the Applicant of the outcome on 26 November 2025; therefore, no further action is required.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; no action taken as final outcome provided.