Kaur v Matharu & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 930 (23 June 2010)
The circuit judge was plainly wrong in exercising discretion to admit fresh evidence, as the material was not fundamentally new, the District Judge had already made clear credibility findings, and justice required finality; the appeal was allowed and the order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Civ 930
- Parties
- Appellant: Kaur; Respondents: Matharu & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Appeal From Circuit Judge's Order Admitting Fresh Evidence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Admission of Fresh Evidence, TOLATA, Discretion in Appellate Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaur
Appellant
Matharu & Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Appeal From Circuit Judge's Order Admitting Fresh Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the circuit judge erred in admitting fresh evidence on appeal in ancillary relief proceedings
- 2 Proper exercise of discretion under Family Proceedings Rule 8.1(3)(b)
- 3 Application of Ladd v Marshall principles in family law appeals
Ratio Decidendi
The circuit judge was plainly wrong in exercising discretion to admit fresh evidence, as the material was not fundamentally new, the District Judge had already made clear credibility findings, and justice required finality; the appeal was allowed and the order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
Orders
- Application granted.
- Appeal allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment