Kaur v Matharu & Anor
The circuit judge was plainly wrong in exercising his discretion to admit the sister's evidence, as the material was not fundamentally new, the credibility findings of the District Judge were clear, and the interests of justice and finality outweighed any justification for reopening the case. The appeal was allowed and the order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kaur; Respondents: Matharu & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (ancillary Relief / Tolata) / Appeal From Circuit Judge's Order Admitting Fresh Evidence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Admission of Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Trusts of Land (tolata), Finality of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaur
Appellant
Matharu & Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (ancillary Relief / Tolata) / Appeal From Circuit Judge's Order Admitting Fresh Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the circuit judge erred in granting permission to admit fresh evidence (affidavit and oral evidence of the sister) on appeal in ancillary relief proceedings involving property ownership under TOLATA.
Ratio Decidendi
The circuit judge was plainly wrong in exercising his discretion to admit the sister's evidence, as the material was not fundamentally new, the credibility findings of the District Judge were clear, and the interests of justice and finality outweighed any justification for reopening the case. The appeal was allowed and the order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Order admitting fresh evidence set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The circuit judge's order granting permission to admit the sister's evidence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment