Miah, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 928 (18 July 2023)
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal against a ruling on admissibility of evidence unless the ruling was made at a formally ordered and announced preparatory hearing. In this case, the only preparatory hearing was on 22 December 2022, which concluded that day. The hearing on 28 April 2023 was not a preparatory hearing, so the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 928
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Kawsor Miah
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Evidentiary Ruling Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Preparatory Hearings, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Admissibility of Evidence, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Kawsor Miah
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Evidentiary Ruling Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal against a ruling on admissibility of evidence not made at a preparatory hearing
- 2 Whether the hearing on 28 April 2023 was a preparatory hearing under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal against a ruling on admissibility of evidence unless the ruling was made at a formally ordered and announced preparatory hearing. In this case, the only preparatory hearing was on 22 December 2022, which concluded that day. The hearing on 28 April 2023 was not a preparatory hearing, so the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- No reporting restrictions apply to this judgment or the applicant's name
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment