KB (A Child) v Borough Council & Ors

KB (A Child) v Borough Council & Ors

The judge below failed to properly conduct the necessary balancing exercise, understated the seriousness of the evidence of harm to TA and the risk to KB, and did not provide adequate reasons for his decision or for departing from the guardian's recommendation. The appellate court found that the evidence required an interim care order for KB to ensure her safety and welfare.

Parties
Appellant: KB (through her Guardian); 1st Respondent: Borough Council; 2nd Respondent: LB (The Mother); 3rd Respondent: RB (The Father)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal Family Law (care Proceedings) / Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Care Order Application
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Interim Care Orders, Supervision Orders, Section 38 Children Act 1989, Section 31(2) Children Act 1989, Judicial Discretion, Welfare of the Child
Family Law Child Protection Interim Care Orders Supervision Orders Section 38 Children Act 1989 Section 31(2) Children Act 1989 Judicial Discretion Welfare of the Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KB (through her Guardian)

Appellant

Borough Council

1st Respondent

LB (The Mother)

2nd Respondent

RB (The Father)

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Family Law (care Proceedings) / Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Care Order Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing an interim care order for KB
  2. 2 Whether the balancing exercise and reasoning were properly conducted
  3. 3 Appropriate application of section 38 Children Act 1989 criteria

Ratio Decidendi

The judge below failed to properly conduct the necessary balancing exercise, understated the seriousness of the evidence of harm to TA and the risk to KB, and did not provide adequate reasons for his decision or for departing from the guardian's recommendation. The appellate court found that the evidence required an interim care order for KB to ensure her safety and welfare.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted
  • Appeal allowed