ABK v KDT & Anor

ABK v KDT & Anor

The court found that the claimant was more likely than not to establish that the photographs and private information should not be disclosed and that the defendants' conduct amounted to harassment, entitling her to a further order in the terms previously granted.

Parties
Claimant: ABK; Defendant: KDT; Defendant: FGH
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Order Hearing
Outcome
Interim non-disclosure and anti-harassment order granted
Legal Topics
Confidentiality, Non Disclosure, Personal Information, Interim Relief
Privacy Harassment Confidentiality Non Disclosure Personal Information Interim Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABK

Claimant

KDT

Defendant

FGH

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Order Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' disclosure of personal photographs and information constitutes a breach of confidentiality and privacy
  2. 2 Whether the defendants' conduct amounts to harassment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was more likely than not to establish that the photographs and private information should not be disclosed and that the defendants' conduct amounted to harassment, entitling her to a further order in the terms previously granted.

Court Disposition

Interim non-disclosure and anti-harassment order granted

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from disclosing claimant’s personal photographs and information
  • Defendants restrained from harassing the claimant through communications or attempts to meet her