Keir Stitt v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The requested information is 'revenue and customs information relating to a person' because it is held in connection with the exercise of a function of the Revenue and Customs in respect of persons liable for Council Tax. Disclosure would enable identification of those persons. Section 44(1)(a) FOIA applies, and the information is absolutely exempt. Section 28 LGFA does not override the statutory prohibition for FOIA purposes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Keir Stitt; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Valuation Office Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Statutory Interpretation, Council Tax, Disclosure Prohibitions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keir Stitt
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Valuation Office Agency
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disclosure of VOA Council Tax database is prohibited under the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (CRCA) and thus exempt under section 44(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
- 2 Whether the information requested is 'revenue and customs information relating to a person' under section 23 CRCA
- 3 Whether section 28 Local Government Finance Act 1992 (LGFA) overrides the prohibition in CRCA for FOIA purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The requested information is 'revenue and customs information relating to a person' because it is held in connection with the exercise of a function of the Revenue and Customs in respect of persons liable for Council Tax. Disclosure would enable identification of those persons. Section 44(1)(a) FOIA applies, and the information is absolutely exempt. Section 28 LGFA does not override the statutory prohibition for FOIA purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The Valuation Office Agency was entitled to withhold the information under section 44 FOIA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment