Mahtani & Anor v Billington [2003] EWHC 3127 (QB) (18 December 2003)
The loans were made personally by the first Claimant to the Defendant; compound interest was payable; limitation does not bar the claim due to part payments; the Defendant's arguments regarding illegality and limitation fail.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 3127 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Parshotam Mahtani; Claimant: Sterling Bureau de Change Ltd; Defendant: Keith Billington
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Loan Agreements, Compound Interest, Limitation Period, Illegality Under Foreign Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parshotam Mahtani
Claimant
Sterling Bureau de Change Ltd
Claimant
Keith Billington
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the agreement of 16 January 1995 made with the first or the second Claimant?
- 2 If with the second Claimant, was it unenforceable by reason of Zambian law?
- 3 Did the agreement give rise to simple or compound interest?
Ratio Decidendi
The loans were made personally by the first Claimant to the Defendant; compound interest was payable; limitation does not bar the claim due to part payments; the Defendant's arguments regarding illegality and limitation fail.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first Claimant
Orders
- Principal sums and compound interest payable to the first Claimant
- Total sum to be agreed or liberty to apply
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment