Keith Gordon v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Disclosure of the redacted information, assumed to be the name of a Supreme Court case involving HMRC and a taxpayer, is prohibited under s 18(1) CRCA as it is held in connection with HMRC's functions and constitutes 'revenue and customs information relating to a person'; s 23 CRCA applies, making the information exempt under s 44(1)(a) FOIA.
- Parties
- Appellant: Keith Gordon; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: HM Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, Taxpayer Confidentiality, Statutory Prohibition on Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith Gordon
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
HM Revenue & Customs
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC was entitled to rely on s 44(1)(a) FOIA to refuse disclosure of redacted information
- 2 Whether the requested information constitutes 'revenue and customs information relating to a person' under s 19(2) CRCA
- 3 Whether disclosure would specify or enable the identity of the person to whom the information relates
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of the redacted information, assumed to be the name of a Supreme Court case involving HMRC and a taxpayer, is prohibited under s 18(1) CRCA as it is held in connection with HMRC's functions and constitutes 'revenue and customs information relating to a person'; s 23 CRCA applies, making the information exempt under s 44(1)(a) FOIA.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- HMRC entitled to rely on s 44(1)(a) FOIA to refuse disclosure
- No further steps required by the Information Commissioner
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment