SBJ Stephenson Ltd v Mandy [1999] EWHC 276 (QB) (30 July 1999)
The restrictive covenants in clauses 12A), 14(i), 14(ii), and 14(iii) were valid and enforceable, SBJ did not commit a repudiatory breach, Mr Mandy breached his obligations by soliciting clients and using confidential information, justifying injunctions and damages.
- Citation
- [1999] EWHC 276
- Parties
- Claimant: SBJ Stephenson Ltd; Defendant: Keith Mandy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Confidential Information, Non Solicitation, Breach of Contract, Implied Duty of Fidelity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SBJ Stephenson Ltd
Claimant
Keith Mandy
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the post-termination restrictive covenants enforceable or void as unreasonable restraints of trade?
- 2 Did SBJ commit a repudiatory breach of contract discharging Mr Mandy from further performance?
- 3 Is there sufficient evidence of breach by Mr Mandy to justify continuing injunctions?
Ratio Decidendi
The restrictive covenants in clauses 12A), 14(i), 14(ii), and 14(iii) were valid and enforceable, SBJ did not commit a repudiatory breach, Mr Mandy breached his obligations by soliciting clients and using confidential information, justifying injunctions and damages.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimant
Orders
- Continuing injunctions granted to enforce clauses 12A), 14(i), 14(ii), and 14(iii) of the contract.
- Damages awarded for loss of commission and fees caused by breach.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment