R v Nelson
Preparation for the application for leave to appeal is covered by the Representation Order and must be remunerated under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013; prescribed fees do not represent reasonable remuneration in this exceptional case, and appropriate fees must reflect the complexity and responsibility borne by counsel.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Keith Nelson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal on Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Remuneration of Counsel, Interpretation of Court Orders, Mental Health Act Sentencing, Exceptional Fee Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Keith Nelson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal on Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether preparation for the application for leave to appeal is covered by the Representation Order for purposes of remuneration under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013
- 2 What constitutes reasonable remuneration for counsel in exceptional circumstances under Schedule 3 of the 2013 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
Preparation for the application for leave to appeal is covered by the Representation Order and must be remunerated under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013; prescribed fees do not represent reasonable remuneration in this exceptional case, and appropriate fees must reflect the complexity and responsibility borne by counsel.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Appellant to be paid £3,250 for the hearing of 16 January 2020, including all preparation.
- Appellant to be paid £6,000 for the appeal hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment