Platt v Platt & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 322 (13 December 2000)

Platt v Platt & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 322 (13 December 2000)

Keith Platt was liable for misrepresentation as he knowingly exaggerated the urgency and seriousness of BMW's concerns, inducing Colin and Denis to transfer their preference shares. The correct measure of damages is the value of the shares as at the date of transfer, assessed on an asset basis with appropriate adjustments for trading profits, discounts, and contingent liabilities, but without deduction for realisation costs, as the business was saleable as a going concern.

Citation
[2000] EWCA Civ 322
Parties
Claimant: Colin Platt; Claimant: Denis Platt; Defendant: Keith Platt
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 December 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; damages recalculated based on revised valuation of Holdings.
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Fiduciary Duty, Share Valuation, Damages Assessment
Company Law Contract Law Tort Law Misrepresentation Fiduciary Duty Share Valuation Damages Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin Platt

Claimant

Denis Platt

Claimant

Keith Platt

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Keith Platt was liable for misrepresentation to Colin and Denis Platt regarding the transfer of preference shares
  2. 2 Whether the damages awarded were correctly assessed based on the value of LJK Holdings Ltd as at 27 May 1992

Ratio Decidendi

Keith Platt was liable for misrepresentation as he knowingly exaggerated the urgency and seriousness of BMW's concerns, inducing Colin and Denis to transfer their preference shares. The correct measure of damages is the value of the shares as at the date of transfer, assessed on an asset basis with appropriate adjustments for trading profits, discounts, and contingent liabilities, but without deduction for realisation costs, as the business was saleable as a going concern.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; damages recalculated based on revised valuation of Holdings.

Orders

  • Value of Holdings as at 27 May 1992 set at £83,000.
  • Damages to Colin and Denis to be recalculated based on revised share values and interest from 27 March 1992 to judgment, less £1 each.