R v Keith Preddie
The representation order dated 31 January 2024 may be construed to permit remuneration for work done by more than one advocate at junior rates prior to its variation. The appellant was instructed and performed work reasonably incurred, and is entitled to remuneration for the 33 hours at junior rates.
- Parties
- Defendant: Keith Preddie; Respondent: The Lord Chancellor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Against Redetermination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in principle
- Legal Topics
- Representation Orders, Remuneration of Advocates, Legal Aid, Interpretation of Remuneration Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith Preddie
Defendant
The Lord Chancellor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Against Redetermination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to remuneration for 33 hours of work incurred prior to 8 August 2024 under the representation order
- 2 Interpretation of the scope of the representation order dated 31 January 2024
- 3 Applicability of junior advocate rates for work done by leading counsel prior to variation of the representation order
Ratio Decidendi
The representation order dated 31 January 2024 may be construed to permit remuneration for work done by more than one advocate at junior rates prior to its variation. The appellant was instructed and performed work reasonably incurred, and is entitled to remuneration for the 33 hours at junior rates.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in principle
Orders
- Remuneration of the 33 hours claimed to be limited to applicable junior rates and remitted to the Respondent for assessment of hours, if not agreed.
- £100 appeal fee to be repaid to the Appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment